maddieegr1′s Blog

Another excellent Edublogs.org weblog

Act 5: The rest is silence

All I could say after reading the final pages of this play were, “AHHHHHH!” I knew that everyone was going to die, but wow, Shakespeare just went crazy killing off four characters within two pages! I am slightly appalled. The deaths came at such a rapid pace, each one seemed to have so little significance. The entire royal family killed themselves or each other while any servants or people present to watch the duel just stood by and watch the madness unfold.

I believe that the queen committed suicide. She was told by Claudius that the wine was poisoned but she drank it anyway. I believe that she finally became too overwhelmed with grief that she could not bear it any longer. And I say good riddance to her because she was a ghastly woman who stood by and watched her late husband die then married the murder all the while knowing that her son was falling into the depths of depression.

The king’s death seemed a bit anti-climatic. The entire plot of this play was essentially Hamlet’s plan for revenge that would ultimately end with his murder of Claudius. Hamlet, who is injured, simply stabs the king and forces him to drink the poisoned wine and he dies. The king does not even seem to attempt to defend himself, I therefore think that the king too consented to his death, and although it was not suicide, he did not fight for his life. He too was overwhelmed by his sin’s and may have felt that the only fit punishment would be death.

Laertes, I believe, died with the most honor. Because it was his sword that eventually killed of Hamlet, he did rightfully avenge his sister and father. He also was able to come clean and admit his shady dealings with the king, which makes him the ONLY character to come fourth and admit his or her wrongdoings. So I commend Laertes, because he is the only player with the courage to admit he is has sinned to others!

And of course, the play ends with the “tragic death of Hamlet.” I did not find his death the least bit sad however. I knew he was eventually going to die, but I never found myself “on Hamlet’s side,” so was not torn apart with his death. Hamlet ruined the lives of everyone around him, even poor Rosenzcratz and Guildenstern! And especially Ophelia, whom he supposedly “loved,” yet never admitted to feeling any remorse for essentially killing her. (As it was the death of her father that caused her to commit suicide.)

—-

For anyone is interested this is how I rate the Shakespeare plays I have read:

1. Much Ado About Nothing

2. Romeo and Juliet

3. The Merchant of Venice

4. Hamlet (sorry Mrs. Hazle, but I did enjoy it, the ending just killed me! )

Act 4: We go to gain a little patch of ground That hath no profit but name

This line was spoken by one of Fortinbras’s guards to Hamlet, Guildenstern, and Rosencrantz when they inquired why Fortinbras’s army was on its way to fight a bloody war. Norway is willing to sacrifice the lives of many men in order to gain an insignificant patch of land. Hamlet responds to this by saying

This is th’ impostume of much wealth and peace,

That inward breaks and shows no cause without

Hamlet is frustrated with the guards, and humans in general, asserting that anyone with money desires more, even if that “more” is insignificant, they will enter a bloody, meaningless fight in order to gain. Hamlet is saying that humans look for any excuse to engage in a bloody fight, concluding that most of the time the matter can be settled in another way.

Hamlet’s response seems hypocritical to me because a day earlier Hamlet murder Polonius because Poloniuswas listening in on Hamlet’s conversation with his mother. Eavesdropping seems to be a very poor reason for murdering someone, yet Hamlet does not seem the least torn up about it, as he has just chastised the guard for killing people unnecessarily.

Since this play is titled, “The Tragedy of Hamlet,” I know more deaths are going to come. I believe that most of these deaths will happen as the characters act on impulse, driven by frivolous motives. The male characters (The King, Laertes, Hamlet, Fortinbras) in this play are “hotheads,” ready to whip out their swords whenever they want. If they would just take a second and step back to analyze the situation further, I predict that most of the deaths to come would be avoided!

   
   

Act 3: “Yonder cloud that’s almost in shape of a camel”

The title of this blog is said by Hamlet in Act 3 scene 2 in a conversation he has with Polonius. I really enjoyed the interactions between Hamlet and Polonius throughout this act because Hamlet treats him with such blunt disrespect. Polonius, however does not seem to pick up on or react to this disrespect, and no matter how insane Hamlet’s words are, he attempts to treat Hamlet with respect. For example, Hamlet and Polonius have a conversation that reads,

Polonius: My lord, the Queen would speak with you, and presently.

Hamlet: Do you see yonder clouds that’s almost in shape of a camel?

Polonius: By the mass, and ’tis like a camel indeed.

Hamlet: Methinks it is like a weasel.

Polonius: It is backed like a weasel.

The conversation begins with Polonius simply requesting that Hamlet go meet his mother, however Hamlet takes this opportunity to comment on cloud shapes, and I believe that he is poking fun at Polonuis while doing this. He seems to be calling Polonius a camel, and then a weasel, and finally a whale. In my opinion  Polonius is either extremely ignorant to Hamlet’s jests, or does not want to cross him which could get him in trouble with the King. I believe that Polonius deserves all of the rude commentary he is receiving from Hamlet, because Polonius is just as cruel as the King.

Reasons why Polonius is a “weasel:”

1. He is a master at hiding behind pillars or tapestry’s in order to listen to other people’s private conversations. (ex: He listens to the conversation between Hamlet and Ophelia and then to the one between Hamlet and his mother. I believe that Hamlet was aware of his presence both times, which is why he made it seem that he did not love Ophelia.)

2. He is posessive and controlling of his kids. (ex: He sends a spy to find out what is son is up to in Paris. He orders Ophelia to stop seeing Hamlet, even though she is clearly old enough to make his own decisions. He seems to use his kids as ways to make himself look better.)

3. He is in a clear alliance with the King, and since he is the King’s “right hand man” it can be assumed that he knows that the King murdered his uncle.

 

 

 

Act 2: “Twas Caviary to the general”

The title of this post is spoken by Hamlet in Act two as he describes an old play he enjoyed. “Twas Caviary to the general” means that the play was unappreciated by the general public because they did not understand it. Like feeding caviar to hobos, who do not have refined taste, and therefore would not appreciate the expensive meal. 

Like the hobos, I feel like I too do not appreciate the substance of this play, because I find that I cannot comprehend half of the references and witty things Shakespeare is saying. I understand the big picture, but wish I could easily twist Shakespeare’s words around to find the meaning in each line. 

For example, while reading Act 2 Scene 2- the part with the actors- I read the entire thing, and found myself hopelessly lost in my attempt to understand the basic story-line of the tale told by Hamlet and the players. It was not until I read Hamlet’s final speech in Act 2 that I realized that the plot to the tale was not of great importance, and the important thing that came out of the scene is Hamlet’s decision to request the actors to perform a play for his uncle. This play will be put on in an attempt to receive a reaction from the King so Hamlet can see if the ghost is telling the truth and Hamlet truly should seek revenge for his father. 

I am frustrated that I spent so much time trying to understand the play about Pyrrhus and Priam, even though its content seems trivial in relation to the plot of Hamlet as a whole. 

Act 1- “It is not, nor cannot come to good.”

The quote in my title is spoken by Hamlet in Act 1 Scene 2, and seems to accurately depict the situation Shakespeare has laid out for us in the opening scene of his play. Shakespeare has put fourth a plethora of problems that will predictably grow throughout this play. A few of these problems are: 

1. Young Fortinbras is demanding the lands back that were lost by his father. (My prediction: Denmark is about to enter into chaos due to Hamlet’s desire for revenge so Fortinbras will get his land back. 

2. Polonius does not want his daughter, Ophelia to be in a relationship with Hamlet. (My prediction: She will be in a relationship with Hamlet and then they will fall apart because he will become so absorbed with his revenge on his uncle.)

3. Hamlet does not like that his mother remarried his uncle so quickly. 

4. Hamlet should be the king of Denmark since his father died, however for some reason his uncle has assumed that role. 

5. The ghost has told Hamlet that his brother murdered him and wants Hamlet to get revenge. (My prediction: Hamlet will get his revenge, but it will cost him his life.) 

6. Hamlet made Horatio and Marcellus swear that they would not tell anyone about Hamlet’s conversation with the ghost. (My prediction: They will, and everyone will think that Hamlet is crazy or the town will go to chaos when they hear about a ghost.)

–There is so much potential for tragedy and problems, I simply cannot stand it! I believe that the root of many of theses issues are the character’s failure to communicate effectively with one another. They enjoy keeping secrets, which tends to lead to problems. 

Maddie’s attempt at writing like Adrienne Rich

Race

Shoes unlaced

I enter the race.

Moving forward

I run back.

Some move weightlessly

gliding to the finish.

I carry a cumbersome load:

the past

the present

the future.

The joyous sounds of the finish

reach my ears.

Carried the long distance by the wind

The joy transforms

into mockery

As the end is no where in sight.

My body resists progress

I tire out.

Rest for a moment

Rest for a lifetime.

I continue

for I have no other choice.

–I wrote this poem in an attempt to mirror Rich’s “Diving Into the Wreck.” Like “Diving Into the Wreck,” my poem portrays a situation, which in this case is a running race, and this race is meant to serve as a symbol for a deeper struggle. One could associate that this poem was meant to represent the feminist movement, and lines such as “the end is no where in sight,” and ” rest for a moment, rest for a lifetime,” show that the character of my poem is losing heart in the never-ending struggles for woman’s rights. The poem is ambiguous, like many of Rich’s poems, and could be interpreted in a number of ways. The overall feeling of the poem is meant to convey desperation, fear, and the sense of being “trapped,” which is the feelings that I experience while reading her poetry. The poem is also free-verse, which is the typical style of Rich’s poetry.

My opinions: Blogging

I thoroughly enjoyed this assignment, and found it much more enjoyable than the fall research paper. This blog project did not bring about so much overwhelming stress and I felt like it helped me manage my time better. The specific due dates for each post really kept my in line. I appreciated that we were able to get this project completed in a shorter amount of time, it made me really get going and be less of a procrastinator. I found that I gained adequate knowledge from both research projects, and do not believe that one method was more effective than the other. I was able to become a expert at my poet, Adrienne Rich, and through are extensive work in class, I was able to connect her to a major master. In this research paper, I found that I assumed the role of the “scholar” in finding intertextuality and analyzing the poetry, which I find more enjoyable because I like being the scholar more that scrolling through endless pages of work that other have done. Overall, I recommend that you continue this next year, as it allows us to do a research paper, and it takes away stress which I believe assists in creating a better final product. As far as improvement goes, I really feel that this project was flawless and does not have much room for improvement. However, if you want more through research done for the intertextuality componet of this project you may want to offer two weeks to complete the post so we could have more time to gather scholarly sources and draw connection. So congratulations Mrs. Hazel and Mr. Hendershot on your innovative ideas that were a total success!!!

Comment Links:

Post 1: * I attempted, with the help of Mr. Hendershot to leave my comment on this blog site and was unable to, but if I could have this is the comment I was going to leave.

I would have left it at this site:

http://heartlikealion.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-diving-into-wreck.htmlDue to my knowledge of Adrienne Rich’s participation in the feminist movement, I too analyzed “Diving Into the Wreck” with a feminist lens. I was amazed at how each image seemed to directly reference Rich’s beliefs on the feminist movement. The ocean clearly does represent the battleground of the feminist movement, and it is up to every woman to choose to go down the ladder, and fight for her rights. Rich describes the apparel she or the woman wears to enter the ocean as “the body-armor of black rubber, the absurd flippers, and the grave and awkward mask.” These images seem to paint an awkward and uncomfortable, to shine light on the fact that many women do not possess the drive or capability to gain rights. However, Rich ends the poem with the line “a book of myths in which our names do not appear.” I believe the book of myths represents all the traditional and stereotypical roles men have placed women in the past, and if woman continue to enter the ocean and fight, their names will not join those of women in the past.

Post 2: Sylvia Plath is similar to Adrienne Rich:

http://nicoleegr1.edublogs.org/2009/03/17/the-colossus/#respond

Post 3: My comment to DJ: Similarities between Rich and Piercy

http://djegr1.edublogs.org/2009/03/23/rich-with-intertextuality/#comment-12

Post 4: My comment to Margo: Atwood and Rich:

http://margoegr5.edublogs.org/2009/03/11/intro-to-atwood/#comment-9

Post 5: My comment to Katie S.: Rich and Hayden

http://katiesegr1.edublogs.org/2009/03/10/robert-hayden-biography/#comment-9

Adrienne Rich and Ezra Pound

*The following presents my analysis on the similarities between Adrienne Rich and Ezra Pound…have fun.

 Through his poetry, Pound experiments with various forms of free verse poetry, looking to break away from traditional forms of poetry. Pound’s poems also are very ambiguous as he favored writing poetry that was abstract, looking to the audience to draw conclusions on the possible meanings of the poems. Pounds ambiguity is effectively portrayed in his poem, “In a Station of the Metro.”

The apparition of theses faces in the crowd;

Petals on a wet, black bough. (Poetry.com)

This poem contains no traditional poetry “rules,” as it has no rhyme, meter, nor clear subject. However, these two lines contain an endless possibility of meanings. I bet if one were to conduct an experiment, asking one-hundred people to read this poem, he or she would receive one hundred different analysis’s of this poem.

Ezra Pound is known as the founder of the imaginist movement.

A movement in poetry which derived its technique from classical Chinese and Japanese poetry–stressing clarity, precision, and economy of language, and foregoing traditional rhyme and meter. (Poets.org)

Pound believes that concrete images are the foundation his poems. He believes that an image should not only paint a picture, but contain other ideas or connotations, and extract an emotion from the reader. In
“In a Station of The Metro,” he created the image of “faces in the crowd” and within the two lines, this image is vividly portrayed. For me, this image was of hundreds of people riding on a subway, everyone preoccupied with his or her own problems, and completely unaware to the happening of the world around him or her.

Ezra Pound, broke free of the barriers of society through his own, unique style of poetry that was unlike most of the poetry before him. By creating the imagenist movement, it seems as if Pound looked to destroy traditional ideologies of how to write poetry, and show that poetry can be beautiful in many forms. His poetry is full of ambiguity, perhaps because because he meant for his poems to have no concrete meaning. In can be assumed that Pound was “lost and confused” as a person because of the life he faced. In 1945, Pound was arrested and charged of treason by the American government for supposedly broadcasting pro-fascist movement information on the public radio. He was not convicted, but shortly after he was forced into the St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington, D.C., and declared mentally ill. It can be assumed that his poetry reflected his feelings of contempt for the government, his poems are nontraditional perhaps because he wanted to prove that the traditional forms of government do not need to be the only accepted forms.  Because Pound was supposedly mentally ill, his poetry perhaps has not concrete meaning and instead portrays the fact that he struggled so deeply with finding himself, or his place in the world, that he was driven insane.

Though examing the biographical information and styles of Ezra Pound compared to Adrienne Rich, I believe that she drew influence from Pound, and his unique stlyle, as she, too, struggled to find herself in the society. This struggle becomes clear through her poetry.

Adrienne Rich published her first book of poetry in 1951, entitled “A Change of World.” Her poems in these works were described by Randall Jarral, a fellow poet, as “poems of a woman living in a fairytale.” (Poetry.org) At this point, Rich had not yet become involved in the world of polictis and feminism. She had not experienced nor heard about the horrers of the Vietnam War, and the crushing realization that she felt trapped in a “man’s world,” where women play an insignificant role. A biography about Adrienne Rich, describes the reasoning for the drastic change in Rich’s poetry,

The form of her poems has evolved with her content, moving from tight formalist lyrics to more experimental poems using a combination of techniques: long lines, gaps in the line, interjections of prose, juxtaposition of voices and motifs, didacticism, and informal expression. Indeed, no poet’s career reflects the cultural and poetic transformations undergone in the United States during the 2Oth century better than that of Adrienne Rich. (Americanpoets.com)

In 1963, Rich published “Snapshots of a Daughter-in-Law,” and readers were able to recognize the dramitic change in her poetry style that resulted from her experciences as a mother and wife. And her increaseing involvement in the anti-war and feminist movement. After the book came out, Rich stated her reasoning behind the drastic change in poetry style and subject,

I did this because I was finished with the idea of a poem as a single, encapsulated event, a work of art complete in itself; I knew my life was changing, my work was changing, and I needed to indicate to readers my sense of being engaged in a long, continuous process. (Americanpoets.com)

The changes in Rich’s life compelled Rich to experience with new methods of poetry-writing. As she turned away from traditional poetry, and traditional subjects, Rich explored and experimented with new , untradidtional forms of poetry that embodid her goal to break away from the normal standards of society. Her poetry has no definite rhyme or meter, and they explore controversial subjects such as the role of women, and Rich’s sexuality.  Both Pound and Rich were frustrated with society, Pound politically and Rich socially and politically. Because their forms of poetry were untraditional and lacking in concrete meaning, both poets seem to have attempted to “prove tradiditional society wrong” by using unconventional meathods of poetry.

It is also interesting to note that Pound and Rich write most of thier poetry in the first person. This gives each poem a more connected feeling, as each poem seems to become a confession, or a expression of the poet’s intermost thoughts. For example, in Pounds poem “Meditatio,” he writies,

When I carefully consider the curious habits of dogs

I am compelled to conclude

That man is the superior animal (americanpoets.com)

In this poem, Pound seems to be very blunt in saying that he, himself views dogs as more intelligent than the human race. Pound seems complelled to write whatever is on his mind, and does not “soften” his poetry to avoid hurt feelings. Like Pound, Rich writes most of her poetry in the first person. In her poem, “Fox,” Rich writes

I needed fox Badly I need

a vixen for the long time none had come near me (poetryarchive.org)

In my opinion, Rich seems to be expressing her sexual preferences, announcing to her audience that she is not happy with her relationships with men, and instead prefers women. Rich is using her poetry as an outlet to express the things she may not want to admit in person. Pound and Rich use their poetry as the ultimate “xanga” or “myspace” where they publish whatever is on their mind, no restrictions. The use of “I” or the first person proves that these are their own thoughts and ideas.

 

 

Adrienne Rich and Margaret Atwood

While searching for a contemporary poet that has a realtionship with mine, I came across blogger margoegr5, and while reading her blog, I immediatly cried out in joy as I realized the obvious connection between our poets. So thank you margoegr5 for helping me this blog post!

According to Margaret Atwood, “Adrienne Rich is one of America’s best poets.” It seems as if the works of Margaret Atwood was deeply influenced by the works of  Adrienne Rich.  Margaret Atwood read and reviewed many of Rich’s poems, some of theses reviews were even published in the New York Times. The following is Atwood’s review on Rich’s “Diving Into the Wreck,” as published in the New York Times.

“If Adrienne Rich were not a good poet,” wrote Margaret Atwood in a review of the book for the New York Times, “it would be easy to classify her as just another vocal Woman’s Libber, substituting polemic for poetry, simplistic messages for complex meanings. But she is a good poet, and her book is not a manifesto, though it subsumes manifestos; nor is it a proclamation, though it makes proclamations. It is instead a book of explorations, of travels.” (Poets.org)

This review shows that Atwood clearly admired Rich’s work, therefore it can be assumed that Atwood would model her own work off of Rich’s. “Diving Into the Wreck”  was published in 1971, while much of Atwood’s poetry was published in the late seventies and early eighties.

According to margoegr5,

“feminism, the power-play of personal relationships, global politics, the environment.” (The Poetry Archive)

Thus, I read Atwood’s poems with a feminist lens, and quickly found that she bears strong feelings concerning the negativity of women’s role in society.

I found that Margaret Atwood’s poem, “The Shadow Voice,” portrays the connection and influence between Atwood and Rich. “The Shadow Voice” expresses the inner qualms of women who feel trapped in their role in society, which is a similar theme to many of Rich’s works, specifically in ”Diving Into the Wreck.”

The Shadow Voice

My shadow said to me:

what is the matter

Isn’t the moon warm

enough for you

why do you need

the blanket of another body

Whose kiss is moss

Around the picnic tables

The bright pink hands held sandwiches

crumbled by distance. Flies crawl

over the sweet instant

You know what is in these blankets

The trees outside are bending with

children shooting guns. Leave

them alone. They are playing

games of their own.

I give water, I give clean crusts

Aren’t there enough words

flowing in your veins

to keep you going. (poetryconnection.com)

As shown in the final stanza, this poem seems to be expressing Atwood’s discontent with being a mother. She seems to be asserting that she regrets becoming a mother, and there is no way to take the child (or children) back. Stanza four, which reads,

The trees outside are bending with

children shooting guns. Leave

them alone. They are playing

games of their own.

This seems to depict a true and awful wish of the mother, which can be assumed to be Atwood. She says to leave the children alone while they are off playing with guns. A mother’s instinct to her child playing with anything even remotely dangerous, would be to interject to ensure the safety of her child. However, Atwood shows is discontent and wish to end her motherhood by saying “leave them alone,” and the children might bring harm to themselves.

Rich, in “Diving Into the Wreck,” shows her desire to enter into the ocean, or the feminist movement, in order to change her role in society. This role, in which she feels trapped, is the traditional role of women in a patriartical society. In her poem, “the book of myths” could be the incorrect assumption that woman are content with their motherly role in society. As Atwood shows, some woman regret or wish away their children, and long for another life.

Living in Sin by Adrienne Rich

In the book ”Adrienne Rich“ By Cheri Colby Langdell, Langdell analyzes Rich’s poem “Living in Sin.” To accurately uncover the true meaning of this poem, Langdell researced Rich’s background to help uncover the roots to the themes in her poetry. Langdell discovered that,
The period between 1949 and 1955 was one of subtle, deep exploration of the tension between containment and liberation, purity and danger, social and sexual risk and its consequences. In the poem “Living in Sin” Rich portrays a discordant, liberated note. (“Adrienne Rich”)
Langdell found that in an interview with David Montenegro, Rich quoted, 
One of the underlying themes of my poetry is the tension between the possibilities in language for mere containment and the possibilities for expansion, for liberation.  
According to Langdell, “Living in Sin” represents,
Denial, guilt, and desire play in this romantic interlude revealing the woman’s lack of equality and freedom in the game of love and romance.

In the poem, lines 15 thorough 22 the man and the woman perform a sequence of actions. The man awakes, plays a few wrongs notes on the piano, and then goes out for cigarettes. While the woman is “jeered by the minor demons,” and then forced to go back to her work, which consists of cooking and cleaning. The man is able to wake up, from a seemingly peaceful sleep, and leave the home to do what he pleases, he is not left to clean up the mess. This mess could mean more than a literal mess, and represent the mess of the relationship. This mess can be ignored by the man as he is free to occupy himself with other things.  The woman, however, does not leave, as she seems to be chained to the home, with no freedom to do what she pleases. In this portion of the poem, the speaker of the poem, which is assumed to be the woman, seems dissatisfied with nowhere to turn. According to Langdell, Rich seems to be suggesting that in a faulty relationship, the man can go off and have affairs, or do whatever he pleases to relieve the pain or stress of his failed relationship. Due to the traditions of society, the woman remain confined to her home, and has no outlet to express her unhappiness, and therefore remain stuck in her situation.

However in lines 22-26, Rich writes,

By evening she was back in love again

though not so wholly but throughout the night

she woke sometimes to feel the daylight coming

like a relentless milkman up the stairs (Poemhunter.com)

Langdell believes that these line show that the woman convinces herself that she is in love with her husband because that is what a woman must do. A women cannot leave a marriage, they are bound and oppressed by it for life, therefore they must constantly convince themselves that they are in love. However the poems says that she wakes throughout the night to the sound of the milkman coming up the stairs. This milkman may serve as the woman’s fantasy, of the man she thought she way marrying. The man all women dream of marrying, who is so good that the woman will not need to convince herself of her love. However, this situation is not reality, and soon the women will awake to the realities of daylight and to the horrors of her present, oppressive, marriage.

—-end of Cheri Langdell’s interpretation.

My interpretation of “Living in Sin” differed greatly from that of Cheri Langdell’s. I believe that the poem is a list of reasons why this woman is unfaithful to her husband. Langdell reads that Rich is portraying the woman as the less dominate figure in the relationship, as is tradition. But, I know that Rich is a very strong feminist, and despite views by a traditional society, she believes women are strong individuals who will not accept dominance by anyone. The first line of the poem reads,

She had though the studio would keep itself

no dust upon the furniture of love (Poemhunter.com)

This seems to be saying that the women entered the relationship with the idea that their love was so strong, neither person would have to work to maintain it. Yet dust did accumulate, just like problems arise in any relationship, but the problems the women is referring to seems to be insurmountable. The woman finds herself longing for something different. The words “half heresy” mean that despite the traditional idea that marriage and love should last forever, she finds that she cannot bear her current situation, as the love is gone, and therefore seeks a new partner. She wishes for “a piano with a Persian shawl” and “a plate of pears,” things of extravagance, which could mean that woman can and will hope for only the best, and need not settle for less.

 When the husband awakes and leaves the house to buy cigarettes, he is completely ignoring the situation. He should remain at the house with his wife, to clean up the mess of their relationship, but he is ignorant of his wife’s unhappiness. This is when the woman is “jeered by the minor demons” and “pulls back the sheets,” suggesting that she is in another relationship. The “minor demons” are other men whom she finds more pleasing than her husband, and she then proceeds to sleep with them.

Rich seems to be suggesting that women have the right to be unfaithful to their partners if they are unhappy. This particular woman, which could represent any woman, is stuck in a relationship or marriage that is lacking love and her husband completely ignores this fact. Therefore she has the right to pursue love, and the right to want the most out of her life.

 

 

Living in Sin (poemhunter.com)
 
 
 

 

  She had thought the studio would keep itself;
no dust upon the furniture of love.
Half heresy, to wish the taps less vocal,
the panes relieved of grime. A plate of pears,
a piano with a Persian shawl, a cat
stalking the picturesque amusing mouse
had risen at his urging.
Not that at five each separate stair would writhe
under the milkman’s tramp; that morning light
so coldly would delineate the scraps
of last night’s cheese and three sepulchral bottles;
that on the kitchen shelf among the saucers
a pair of beetle-eyes would fix her own—
envoy from some village in the moldings . . .
Meanwhile, he, with a yawn,
sounded a dozen notes upon the keyboard,
declared it out of tune, shrugged at the mirror,
rubbed at his beard, went out for cigarettes;
while she, jeered by the minor demons,
pulled back the sheets and made the bed and found
a towel to dust the table-top,
and let the coffee-pot boil over on the stove.
By evening she was back in love again,
though not so wholly but throughout the night
she woke sometimes to feel the daylight coming
like a relentless milkman up the stairs.